Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ramkumar Ramanathan vs Paul Jubb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ramanathan vs Jubb analysis and find out who is favored!
Ramkumar Ramanathan vs Paul Jubb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ramanathan 0 - 0 Jubb
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ramanathan has won 52.25% of points on their second serve, while Jubb has won 52.48%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ramanathan, in recent form, has won 48.99% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jubb has won 53.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.36% and 35.21% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ramanathan has saved 70.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jubb has saved 64.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ramanathan has won 65% of matches played (W/L 39/ 21), with Jubb winning 68.29% (W/L 56/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ramanathan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 283/ 200), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 28/ 41). Jubb has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 51/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 13/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Ramanathan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 90% of matches (W/L 27/ 3), where as Jubb has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 30/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ramanathan has played against opponents with an average rank of 223 while Jubb has played against players with an average rank of 281.06.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ramanathan has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jubb has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ramanathan has converted 37.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jubb has converted 40.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
329
Rank
111
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
298
Rank
196
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
54% (434-376)
Career Total W/L
70% (203-89)
58% (19-14)
YTD W/L
67% (33-16)
$416,385
Career Prize Money
$54,540
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ramkumar Ramanathan vs Paul Jubb For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Ramanathan VS Jubb
Sportsbook
Offer
Ramanathan VS Jubb H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ramkumar Ramanathan | Paul Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (19/14) | 67% (33/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (41/32) | 64% (75/42) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (376/337) | 55% (619/514) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (18/14) | 74% (20/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 100% (1/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Aces pg | 0.66 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 232 | 219 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 80 | 153 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:52 | 1:48:9 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 259 | 263.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1266/2043) | 63% (2225/3549) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (942/1266) | 72% (1594/2225) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (406/777) | 52% (694/1324) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (64/171) | 40% (160/397) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (728/2025) | 42% (1569/3779) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (9/12) | 67% (26/13) |
| Futures W/L | 82% (9/2) | 78% (7/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (19/33) | 67% (32/48) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 27% (3/11) | 71% (10/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 50% (10/20) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (15/15) | 84% (32/27) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (15/0) | 16% (32/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (18/4) | 35% (17/6) |
Ramkumar Ramanathan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
9
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
10
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
17
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
77 of
129)
10
Aces
27
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
59 of
77)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
0%
(
0 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
28 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
43 of
129)
119
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Ulises Blanch
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Yshai Oliel
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
15
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
6 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
12
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Bang Shuo Yin
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
10
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
10
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Paul Jubb
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
46%
(
18 of
39)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Paul Jubb
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
9
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
28 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
103
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 6-7(14) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
3
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Paul Jubb
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Alex Michelsen
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
117)
11
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
47 of
75)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
117)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Omar Jasika
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
76%
(
55 of
72)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
7 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Charles Broom
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Paul Jubb
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Daniil Glinka
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Altug Celikbilek
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Ramanathan Vs Jubb Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ramanathan are available here and Jubb photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
